British MP Rupert Lowe is out with The Rape Gang Inquiry Report. The report is a deep-dive into examining the ‘systematic targeting of vulnerable girls, overwhelmingly White British, by predominantly Muslim Pakistani gangs across towns and cities up and down the nation.’ The BBC, as expected, is silent. In addition, The Independent has called Lowe ‘rapidly becoming the most dangerous man.’
2,50,000 young girls. Note this. According to the report, this is the number of girls targeted by grooming gangs across Britain. Many were minors and primarily from working-class white backgrounds. Yet neither police officers, social workers, politicians, NHS officials, nor the bleeding-heart liberals and perpetually angry pseudo-feminists who dominate parts of the political establishment seemed willing to confront what was happening. Why? Because calling out the perpetrators risked accusations of being ‘racist.’
For example, as per the report, one of the survivors, Chloe, who endured years of abuse, testified that the local police, social services, and government officials were fully aware of the organised and racialised nature of the abuse, yet they refused to intervene because ‘they did not want to be seen as racist.’ Then, when the mother of another survivor, Fiona (who estimates she was abused by between 50 and 100 men, of those, only two were not Pakistani), called the police to report her child missing, warning them about the demographic profile of the men targeting her daughter. The police call handler, instead of helping, reprimanded her. Instead of dispatching assistance, the call handler said: ‘You can’t describe them as Asian men because that’s racist. You should just be glad that your child is being taught a different culture.’
Britain failed despite possessing one of the most sophisticated administrative, legal, and policing apparatuses in the world and its failure was nothing but ideological.
An internalised oppressor-oppressed binary paralysed the very institutions tasked with protecting vulnerable children. The oppressor-oppressed binary functions as a zero-sum game where all social, cultural, and political institutions are viewed as mechanisms intentionally designed and controlled by oppressors to perpetuate the exploitation of the oppressed.
Trapped within this very rigid framework, officials became reluctant to confront uncomfortable truths. Because the perpetrators belonged to the so-called ‘marginalised’ community and the victims largely came from a ‘supposedly’ privileged racial community. Hence, police officers, politicians, and social workers were petrified that taking decisive action against those men would lead to accusations of racism. And so they continued to allow children to be raped and tortured while remaining hesitant to confront Pakistani Muslim grooming gangs because the fear of being labelled racist had become deeply ingrained within the political and bureaucratic establishment.
The British rape gang scandal, therefore, is a representation of something more than just a failure of policing or social services. It is a case study in what happens when multiculturalism, having percolated through educational, social, political, and bureaucratic institutions, supersedes reality and when political dogma overwhelms the state’s most fundamental responsibility of the protection of its most vulnerable citizens, namely children. A state that cannot protect its children has failed in its most basic duty. A state that refuses to do so because of ideological paralysis has failed twice.
To truly understand the absolute subjugation inflicted upon these victims, one must peel back the veneer of ordinary criminality, and must look at the religious engine driving these crimes. It must be looked at for what it was, which is nothing but ethno-religious conquest by Islamists. Those victims were chosen deliberately and then raped, tortured, enslaved, and treated worse than animals precisely because of their non-Muslim identity. That this report reveals that these rape networks operated within a pre-modern Islamic supremacist framework, where they saw non-Muslim women and girls not as human beings worthy of respect and rights, but as subhuman commodities, legitimate spoils available for boundless exploitation. The calculus of the perpetrators was explicitly rooted in an honor-and-shame culture that bifurcated the world into pure believers and impure kaffirs.
One of the survivors, Dr Ella Hill, testified that her abusers explicitly told her: ‘Muslim women are pure because they cover down to their ankles, while white girls show the curves of their body, so they are asking for it. They should be raped as punishment for not obeying Allah.’ Hill then goes on to say that the violence was religiously justified by their abusers, stating: ‘They believed they had a position of religious moral superiority over nonbelievers. They believed it was their duty to punish us, as they believed that doing so made them good Muslims. This is what they were taught by their mothers.’
Another survivor, Jen, recalls being called a ‘white trash, English pig-dog.’ It must be noted that both pig and dog are deemed ‘unclean’ in Islamic tradition.
If this is not the most damning critique of multiculturalism, then what is? That multiculturalism, in its current form, is nothing but a derivative ideology of Marxism. Many frontline social workers who received direct complaints from victimised girls were directed by their managers not to record the ethnic origin of the perpetrators for the same reason. Even senior councillors admitted that they ignored reports of organised rapes because they feared that addressing these crimes would give oxygen to racist perspectives and threaten community cohesion.
The 2014 Jay Report exposed how Labour councillors and senior officials in Rotherham dismissed the systematic rape of 1,400 girls because to do otherwise risked alienating the Pakistani community. They essentially made a deal with the devil to protect their own positions, chairs, and political careers, using those poor girls as sacrificial lambs. Even the former Chief Crown Prosecutor, Nazir Afzal, had to admit that ‘white professionals’ over-sensitivity to political correctness and fear of appearing racist may well have contributed to justice being stalled.’
When white British girls were raped, tortured, and converted on an industrial scale, the inaction was driven by the fact that the leftist administrative state and much of society believed that an oppressed group can never commit systemic violence against an oppressor group. Since the rapists were Pakistani Muslim men (hence an oppressed group) and the victims were white girls (who carried white privilege), this abuse either never happened or those victimized white girls were overreacting due to cultural differences.
Under this rigid Oppressor-Opressed binary, for an oppressor community to be systemically victimized by the oppressed group is not just unlikely, but an ontological impossibility. This theory presents no theoretical mechanism to perceive an event where even the so-called marginalized community can be sadistic abusers.
So, rather than abandoning their flawed thinking, some people in power or who had power instead chose to ignore these girls, and worse, dismissed them as prostitutes, because viewing them as innocent victims brutalized by Muslim men would break the intersectional model on which their entire politics is built.
The ‘rape of Britain’ was thus sanctioned by the silence and complicity of the left, because in the religion of identity Marxism, the marginalized Muslims must be protected at all costs, even if the altar of multiculturalism is overflowing with the blood of innocents.
